首页> 外文OA文献 >Gestural communication of the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) : repertoire, intentionality, and possible origins
【2h】

Gestural communication of the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) : repertoire, intentionality, and possible origins

机译:大猩猩(大猩猩)的手势传达:曲目,意图和可能的起源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Social groups of gorillas were observed in three captive facilities and one African field site. Cases of potential gesture use, totalling 9,540, were filtered by strict criteria for intentionality, giving a corpus of 5,250 instances of intentional gesture use. This indicated a repertoire of 102 gesture types. Most repertoire differences between individuals and sites were explicable as a consequence of environmental affordances and sampling effects: overall gesture frequency was a good predictor of universality of occurrence. Only one gesture was idiosyncratic to a single individual, and was given only to humans. Indications of cultural learning were few, though not absent. Six gestures appeared to be traditions within single social groups, but overall concordance in repertoires was almost as high between as within social groups. No support was found for the ontogenetic ritualization hypothesis as the chief means of acquisition of gestures. Many gestures whose form ruled out such an origin, i.e. gestures derived from species-typical displays, were used as intentionally and almost as flexibly as gestures whose form was consistent with learning by ritualization. When using both classes of gesture, gorillas paid specific attention to the attentional state of their audience. Thus, it would be unwarranted to divide ape gestural repertoires into 'innate, species-typical, inflexible reactions' and 'individually learned, intentional, flexible communication'. We conclude that gorilla gestural communication is based on a species-typical repertoire, like those of most other mammalian species but very much larger. Gorilla gestures are not, however, inflexible signals but are employed for intentional communication to specific individuals.
机译:在三个俘虏设施和一个非洲野外地点观察到了大猩猩的社会群体。通过严格的故意标准过滤了可能使用手势的案例(总计9,540个),给出了5,250个故意使用手势实例的语料库。这表明有102种手势类型。由于环境条件和采样效果的影响,个人和站点之间的大多数曲目差异都是可以解释的:总体手势频率可以很好地预测发生的普遍性。一个人只有一个手势是特质的,并且只给了人类。文化学习的迹象虽然很少,但很少。六个手势似乎是单个社会群体中的传统,但是曲目中的总体一致性几乎与社会群体中的一样。没有发现支持本体遗传仪式化假设作为手势获取的主要手段。有很多形式被排除在这种起源之外的手势,即从典型物种展示衍生的手势,被有意地并且几乎与形式与通过仪式化学习相一致的手势一样灵活地使用。当使用两种手势时,大猩猩都特别注意其听众的注意力状态。因此,将猿类的手势库分为“先天的,物种典型的,不灵活的反应”和“个人学习的,有意的,灵活的交流”是不必要的。我们得出的结论是,大猩猩的手势交流是基于物种的典型库,就像大多数其他哺乳动物物种的库一样,但体积要大得多。但是,大猩猩的手势并不是僵硬的信号,而是用于与特定个人进行有意的交流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号